Current:Home > ContactThis Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early -ChatGPT
This Is the single worst reason to claim Social Security early
View
Date:2025-04-16 22:31:34
Don't claim Social Security early for the wrong reasons
Many Americans fear for the future of Social Security, and this could be leading them to make some bad choices.
In fact, one recent study showed 44% of people think Social Security is going to run out of money before their retirement. This is one reason more than four in 10 people indicate they plan to claim Social Security between the ages of 62 and 65. By contrast, just 10% plan to wait until 70.
While it may seem smart to collect benefits ASAP in such a scenario, this is actually the worst possible reason to claim Social Security early. Here's why.
Making decisions related to Social Security because of a fear you won't get any benefits at all is a short-sighted choice that could cost you thousands of dollars. There are a few reasons for that.
Despite popular belief, Social Security is not in danger of running out of money. It has a steady revenue stream that comes from current workers' payroll taxes. This is not going to stop happening unless everyone in the U.S. stops working or unless the funding mechanism is changed -- which is extremely unlikely to occur.
It is true, however, that Social Security's trust fund is in danger of depletion by 2033. But if that happens, there would still be enough money coming from tax revenue to pay about 77% of the benefits promised. That's a hit, but it doesn't mean you won't get any of your retirement funds
Can I collect Social Security yet?It depends on when you were born.
Claiming Social Security early guarantees a smaller monthly check
The reality is, an early Social Security claim is going to mean you definitely get a smaller monthly benefit.
That's because you will get hit with early filing penalties if you claim before FRA. These could shrink your monthly checks by as much as 30% depending on how far ahead of schedule you start payments. And if you wait until FRA but not until age 70, you'll pass up delayed retirement credits that increase your monthly benefit up to 8% for each full year that you delay payments.
You do give up income by waiting to get benefits, but the majority of retirees are better off waiting until 70 because the larger monthly checks from claiming at that age add up to higher lifetime income from Social Security.
So, unless there are clear reasons why you want your benefits early -- such as concerns about your health or a desire to retire early that hinges on Social Security -- you should think very carefully before you make that choice. And definitely don't claim benefits prematurely out of fear of a future without them as that's unlikely to happen.
The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
Offer from the Motley Fool:The $22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets"
veryGood! (7)
Related
- Which apps offer encrypted messaging? How to switch and what to know after feds’ warning
- Jeannie Epper, epic stuntwoman behind feats of TV’s ‘Wonder Woman,’ dies at 83
- All eyes on The Met: What celebs will see inside Monday's high-fashion gala
- White-coated candy recalled nationwide over salmonella risk
- Tarte Shape Tape Concealer Sells Once Every 4 Seconds: Get 50% Off Before It's Gone
- St. Louis Blues make Drew Bannister full-time coach; Ottawa Senators hire Travis Green
- Disobey Tesla at your own risk: Woman tries to update vehicle while inside as temp hits 115
- South Carolina lawmakers rekindle bill limiting how topics like race are taught
- US appeals court rejects Nasdaq’s diversity rules for company boards
- Deadline for businesses to apply for their share of massive credit card company settlement looms
Ranking
- Cincinnati Bengals quarterback Joe Burrow owns a $3 million Batmobile Tumbler
- Doja Cat Is Essentially Naked in 2024 Met Gala After-Party Look
- Bend the Knee to Gwendoline Christie’s Hair-Raising Met Gala Look
- Jeannie Epper, epic stuntwoman behind feats of TV’s ‘Wonder Woman,’ dies at 83
- Scoot flight from Singapore to Wuhan turns back after 'technical issue' detected
- A Colorado teen disappeared in a brutal Korean War battle. His remains have finally been identified.
- Blake Lively Misses the 2024 Met Gala
- Key events of Vladimir Putin’s 24 years in power in Russia
Recommendation
Where will Elmo go? HBO moves away from 'Sesame Street'
Emily Ratajkowski Frees the Nipple in NSFW Met Gala 2024 Look
Why Kim Kardashian Skipped the 2024 Met Gala After-Parties
Minnesota fire department mourns death of firefighter after weekend shooting: 'It's a rough day'
Pregnant Kylie Kelce Shares Hilarious Question Her Daughter Asked Jason Kelce Amid Rising Fame
Pope Francis appoints new bishop in Tennessee after former bishop’s resignation under pressure
WWE King and Queen of the Ring 2024 bracket: Schedule, results of tournament
Met Gala 2024: We Couldn't Help But Wonder How Sarah Jessica Parker Stole the Show This Year